Response to the American Science Acceleration Project RFI
IAPS's response to a US RFI argues that AI reliability, security and safety R&D, plus an assurance consortium, are needed for trustworthy AI use in frontier science.
Research / Sources
IAPS
Policy research on advanced AI security and governance. www.iaps.ai
Research Report (25)Compute governance (23)Frontier Security (22)International governance & China (18)Policy and Standards (18)Erich Grunewald (16)Jam Kraprayoon (14)Link Post (14)Oliver Guest (11)Linkpost (10)Joe O'Brien (9)Chris Covino (8)Issue Brief (8)Oscar Delaney (7)Bill Anderson-Samways (6)Responses to RFIs/RFCs (6)Matthew Mittelsteadt (5)Renan Araujo (5)Theo Bearman (5)Blog Post (4)Cara Labrador (4)Shaun Ee (4)Asher Brass (3)International Strategy (3)Onni Aarne (3)Brianna Rosen (2)Clarissa Koh (2)Hamish Low (2)Karson Elmgren (2)Sambhav Maheshwari (2)Sarah Godek (2)Article (1)Cassia King (1)Commentary (1)Dave Banerjee (1)Jan Wehner (1)Request for Information (RFI) Response (1)Sumaya Nur Adan (1)
Focus All
Topic All
Date Any time
Response to OSTP RFI on the Development of a 2025 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan
IAPS's response to a US federal RFI recommends AI R&D priorities on model security, reliability and capability assessments, supply chain security, and monitoring adversary AI, citing misalignment risks.
Response to OSTP RFI on AI Action Plan
IAPS's comment on the US AI Action Plan argues for building trust in American AI through security and reliability standards, securing supply chains, denying adversaries advanced compute, and adaptive frameworks.
Response to BIS RFC on Establishment of Reporting Requirements for the Development of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Models and Computing Clusters
IAPS's response to a US BIS proposed rule recommends expanding reporting of frontier AI models and compute clusters to third-party evaluators, civil society, and public bodies, with ad hoc reporting and information sharing.
Response to the RFC on U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute's AI-800-1 Draft Document
IAPS's response to NIST's AI 800-1 draft recommends restructuring misuse-risk guidance for dual-use foundation models around the product lifecycle, considering tool affordances, and adding post-deployment and model-theft guidance.
Response to the DOD RFI on Defense Industrial Base Adoption of Artificial Intelligence for Defense Applications
IAPS's response to a DoD RFI urges DoD-wide testing, evaluation and security standards for dual-use foundation models acquired through the defense industrial base, plus information-sharing with the US AI Safety Institute.