IAPS Researchers React: The US AI Action Plan
IAPS experts review the US AI Action Plan through a national security and AGI-risk lens, praising its goals and identifying gaps and implementation considerations.
Research / Sources
Policy research on advanced AI security and governance. www.iaps.ai
IAPS experts review the US AI Action Plan through a national security and AGI-risk lens, praising its goals and identifying gaps and implementation considerations.
A forecasting workshop with professional forecasters and US AI policy experts estimates the chance that a US government-led project would build and acquire the first advanced AI, and how it would be controlled.
IAPS's response to a DoD RFI urges DoD-wide testing, evaluation and security standards for dual-use foundation models acquired through the defense industrial base, plus information-sharing with the US AI Safety Institute.
A systematic search of US federal agencies identifies regulatory case studies, using measures like expertise, risk assessment and enforcement, that could inform how advanced AI should be regulated.
Evaluates Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy against UK DSIT guidance on responsible capability scaling, arguing its risk thresholds should be lower and grounded in societal risk tolerances from other industries.
Examines the US Federal Select Agent Program as a biosecurity precedent and draws lessons for AI regulation, covering development-phase licensing, regulatory expertise, and risk-based versus list-based approaches.