Research / Sources
Expert essays on AI safety, policy and governance. ai-frontiers.org
Argues against nationalizing AI and proposes a narrower government 'halt right' to pause frontier AI firms, targeting catastrophic risks that taxation, antitrust and contract law cannot handle.
An excerpt arguing that halting the race toward AGI is feasible, and that commercial incentives, not technical inevitability, are what keep frontier AI development going despite extinction-risk warnings.
Argues that new EU and California laws requiring AI content provenance metadata will expand digital records that help trace and verify media, a governance tool against deepfake harms.
Argues that governments adopting AI should measure how deployed models' values and reasoning compare with the public's, and proposes an independent body to assess and justify divergences.
Analyses over 60 mainland Chinese media sources covering Western AI safety essays and finds sympathetic, credible summaries that avoid US-China competition, with implications for international AI policy.
Argues that AI alignment should be defined by citizens through participatory processes rather than corporations or experts, using Taiwan's response to AI-generated scam ads as the example.
An AI Frontiers opinion arguing that precautionary fears about frontier risks are keeping open-source models behind closed frontier models, and that openness should be the default.
Essay arguing that autonomous AI-enabled organizations with limited human oversight and opaque owners could break economic regulation, and calling for governance responses.