Research / Sources
Research preprints from the scientific community. arxiv.org
A World Internet Conference report reviewing global AI safety governance practices and proposing a UN-centred international framework with institutional and policy recommendations.
A 2026 report from China's WIC AI committee reviewing frontier AI risks, global governance practices, readiness gaps, and proposing coordinated governance mechanisms.
Proposes the PAAI framework for who controls AI evaluation infrastructure and independence, applying it to African evaluation projects and AI Safety Institute joint testing, finding participation alone doesn't confer authority.
Uses Project Glasswing's restricted release of a vulnerability-finding model to show access helped firms find and fix more flaws, without evident attacker gains, but created cross-country asymmetry.
Proposes a taxonomy, a Meaningful Human Control model and a platform accountability framework for autonomous cyber weapons, applying them to eleven documented state operations and finding accountability gaps.
Argues that a US-China race to AGI creates three dangers, including loss of control to superintelligent agents, and that both countries should prioritise AI safety and avoid provoking the race.
A review essay of Maas's framework for global AI governance, arguing that institutional design depends on power distribution, especially among states and the few companies making frontier AI decisions.
Assesses whether underwater data centers could enable covert frontier AI training that evades treaty verification, finding them feasible only for well-resourced states and detectable via construction signatures and surveillance.
Shows an external power-draw side channel can identify AI training versus inference on an H200 GPU for compute governance, and a hardened detector still catches most evasion attempts.
Argues non-great-power conflict could be a major catastrophic risk channel for advanced AI, testing pathways via war escalation, terrorism and AI loss of control, and identifies shared intermediate variables.
Maps provisions in twenty AI middle-power jurisdictions governing general-purpose AI, finding broad form but weak binding force, with little binding evaluation duty on model developers outside the EU.
Proposes a traceable framework for comparing national AI regulation portfolios across major jurisdictions, scoring whether they govern serious AI risks and whether institutions can implement them.
Examines how US export controls on frontier AI access interact with cyber threats, arguing access can be revoked and proposing layered strategies for small and middle powers' AI sovereignty.
A preregistered experiment finds that the perceived national origin of a GPT-4o chatbot does not change its persuasive power, suggesting origin labeling offers weak protection against foreign AI influence operations.
Analyses African governments' AI policy statements and national strategies, finding strong focus on AI opportunities but comparatively little attention to AI safety risks.
Presents the methodology for the 2nd edition of the Global Index on Responsible AI, a cross-national index scoring government AI governance across five dimensions, including trust and safety and unacceptable-risk AI.
A seven-country conjoint survey finds citizens favour safety over innovation, public over private AI governance, and international over national regulation, with safety preference strongest among those seeing AI as risky.
A multi-country consensus from 100+ contributors setting global priorities for technical AI safety research, with new focus on societal resilience and risks from autonomous agents.
Proposes measuring AI-assisted writing in public government documents as a monitoring method for government AI adoption, and finds signals rising by 2026 in four of ten U.S. and PRC sources.
Argues that AI used in foreign policy is a priority case for technical AI governance, reviews the evaluation ecosystem's gaps, and proposes a framework that decomposes statecraft workflows into bounded, evaluable sub-tasks.
Argues that autonomous AI-mediated cyber operations strain IHL's direct-causation test and that existing AI governance instruments fail to log goal-specification granularity, the property the paper identifies as central.
Analyzes how international restrictions on frontier AI research toward superintelligence could be verified, cataloguing 28 candidate verification mechanisms such as whistleblowers, search warrants and training code reviews.
Surveys existing international agreements and proposes how conditions for relaxing limits on frontier AI development should be set, recommending a time-limited framework with an oversight organization and withdrawal option.
Argues that frontier AI models have become decisive cyber-offense tools, that access to them is gated by a small group of developers, and that Africa must respond through threat-intelligence sharing and governance within a six-to-twelve-month window.
Proposes a taxonomy for assessing enforceability of international frontier AI agreements, identifying enforcement breaking points as compute thresholds fall and finding gaps in resource acquisition and detection policies.
Examines the EU Digital Omnibus amendment to the AI Act through legislative legitimacy, arguing competitiveness pressures create a legitimacy dilemma for AI regulation.
Position paper arguing AI researchers must help lead arms control research, using nuclear-deterrence lessons, to reduce risks from frontier AI models integrated into military systems.
Proposes memetic capture as a concept for AI-driven cultural disempowerment and a four-tier Cultural Pluralistic Governance Framework with policy levers and a research agenda.
Position paper arguing AI governance should use ISO-like interoperability protocols with standardized, machine-readable risk labels for bias, energy use and data provenance, rather than relying on jurisdiction-specific laws alone.
Compares EU, US and Chinese AI regulations for high-risk uses, identifies interoperability and cross-regime compliance gaps, and proposes machine-checkable RDF/OWL compliance artefacts.
Proposes applying OSINT and threat-intelligence methods to detect AI systems operating outside human control, identifying observable traces and recommending an independent, federated international monitoring architecture.
Argues that AGI could emerge around 2030-2040 and reshape geopolitics, finds Europe under-prepared on frontier AI awareness, compute and policy, and proposes a coordinated European preparedness agenda.
Uses game theory to show that a superintelligence moratorium can be in states' self-interest when perceived loss-of-control costs are high enough, arguing such a pause is increasingly plausible.
Proposes an international escalation framework for AI incidents, with eight criteria and a flowchart, tested against ten incidents to find systematic under-detection patterns.
Argues that restricting open-weight AI model access may displace risk, and proposes hardware-layer attestation plus multilateral institutions as a defense-in-depth alternative to binary openness-versus-restriction governance.
Proposes a feasibility taxonomy of 20 hardware-level mechanisms for governing frontier AI compute, mapping them to regulatory and treaty scenarios and identifying the R&D gaps that block verifiable agreements.
Presents an LLM-based framework that compares AI safety policy documents under a shared activity taxonomy, finding that model choice substantially changes the comparison results and only partly matches human judgments.
Surveys how regulators, international bodies and developers define agentic AI, finds technical inaccuracies in legal definitions, and argues these definitions leave the mechanisms of agent autonomy ungoverned.
Argues that the EU should build a stronger supranational AI agency beyond the AI Act and AI Office to improve risk assessment, policy coherence and international cooperation.
An international expert report synthesising scientific evidence on general-purpose AI capabilities, emerging risks, and safety, commissioned by nations attending the AI Safety Summit.