Our Current Policy Positions
Apollo Research outlines five policy positions for governments, arguing evaluations alone are insufficient and that AI safety needs defence-in-depth, independent verification, and interpretability.
Research / Sources
Understanding and evaluating deceptive AI. apolloresearch.ai
Apollo Research outlines five policy positions for governments, arguing evaluations alone are insufficient and that AI safety needs defence-in-depth, independent verification, and interpretability.
Apollo Research announces its engagement with US AI governance bodies (AISI Consortium, NIST working groups) to build an international evaluation ecosystem for dangerous capabilities and misalignment.
Apollo Research recommends that the UK AI Safety Summit pursue international commitments on AI risk classification, responsibilities across the value chain, and evaluation-based compliance for frontier models.