No instrumental convergence without AI psychology
Argues that instrumental and success-conditioned convergence both depend on assumptions about AI psychology and plan-selection, so danger cannot be attributed to plan-space or reality alone.}
Research / Sources
Discussion and research on AI alignment. alignmentforum.org
Argues that instrumental and success-conditioned convergence both depend on assumptions about AI psychology and plan-selection, so danger cannot be attributed to plan-space or reality alone.}
Conceptual essay arguing LLM personas inherit human-text biases that leak information across character boundaries, causing hallucination, manipulation and spiritual-guru behaviour, and assessing self-other overlap alignment.
A podcast interview with Owain Evans covering LLM introspection experiments (Looking Inward), self-prediction, backdoors, and emergent misalignment, with safety motivations like honesty and detecting unintended goals.
An exploratory essay that maps RL policy entropy and RLHF onto psychotherapy concepts, reviews RLHS and RISE, and proposes three untested alignment training methods.
Conceptual post arguing that human-centric assumptions about AI individuality distort safety reasoning about scheming, goal preservation, and coordination among AI systems, with stories illustrating the risks.