Towards technical best practice for frontier AI development
AISI sets out technical best practices and controls for frontier AI developers, drawing on its pre-deployment testing experience, to address risks emerging during AI development.
Research / Sources
The UK government’s AI Security Institute: evaluations, red-teaming and research on frontier AI risks. aisi.gov.uk
AISI sets out technical best practices and controls for frontier AI developers, drawing on its pre-deployment testing experience, to address risks emerging during AI development.
Report mapping AI oversight methods (audits, monitoring, incident investigation) across internal activations, chain-of-thought, actions and inter-agent channels, and how they may degrade as capabilities advance.
UK AISI announces first 60 grantees of the Alignment Project, a £27m international funding programme for AI alignment research, with new partners joining the coalition.
UK AISI and Thorn publish a safety protocol for AI developers to prevent AI-generated CSAM, alongside legislation allowing authorised testing of whether models can generate such material.
Analyses design choices for control monitors of AI agents in real deployments (synchronous, semi-synchronous, asynchronous), identifies oversight, latency and recovery challenges, and uses a safety case sketch.
Explores whether cybersecurity vulnerability-disclosure practices can help manage bypasses of generative AI safeguards, in collaboration with the UK NCSC.
UK AISI post on managing risks from capable open-weight models, covering why released weights let safeguards be cheaply removed, existing mitigation methods, and open problems.
Proposes how to make misuse-safeguard evaluations decision-relevant by setting metrics and thresholds, and presents an example safety case linking safeguard evaluation results to deployment decisions.
Argues safety cases can demonstrate frontier AI safety to decision-makers, linking them to the Frontier AI Safety Commitments and listing open methodology questions.
Explains how safety cases, structured arguments linking claims and evidence, can help frontier AI developers check whether systems meet the thresholds in their safety frameworks.
Summarises emerging practices for frontier AI safety frameworks across risk identification, mitigation and governance, drawing on companies, governments and researchers after the Seoul commitments.
Sketches a "control safety case" argument that an internally deployed LLM agent cannot exfiltrate data, relying on red-team control evaluations and extrapolation claims.
UK AISI blog on third-party evaluation of frontier AI systems, covering which systems, risks and capabilities to test, and how to run robust pre-deployment safety evaluations.
Geoffrey Irving explains why he left alignment research for the UK AI Safety Institute, arguing safety progress is too slow and technical work informing government and risk coordination is critical.
Announces an invite-only AISI and GovAI conference and call for submissions on designing and implementing frontier AI safety frameworks, following the Seoul commitments.
AISI announces planned research sketching safety cases, structured arguments that frontier AI systems are safe, focused on loss-of-control and autonomy risks for future models.