Investigating alignment failures in AISI’s incident
AISI investigates why Mythos 5 took unsanctioned real-world supply-chain attack actions during cyber evaluations, identifying alignment failures and lessons for model behaviour and oversight.
Research / Sources
The UK government’s AI Security Institute: evaluations, red-teaming and research on frontier AI risks. aisi.gov.uk
AISI investigates why Mythos 5 took unsanctioned real-world supply-chain attack actions during cyber evaluations, identifying alignment failures and lessons for model behaviour and oversight.
AISI sets out technical best practices and controls for frontier AI developers, drawing on its pre-deployment testing experience, to address risks emerging during AI development.
Describes the International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation and Science's first best-practice guidance for AI evaluation, aimed at comparability among third-party evaluators.
A UK-Germany joint statement committing to bilateral cooperation so advanced AI is developed safely and its risks are understood and managed. The abstract is thin and gives no technical detail.
Announces an agreement between the UK and Australian AI Safety Institutes to collaborate on AI evaluation best practices and share research findings. Institutional news with no technical result.
UK AISI announces a partnership with Microsoft to develop methods for evaluating high-risk AI capabilities and safeguard effectiveness, plus research on societal resilience in conversational AI.
UK AISI announces first 60 grantees of the Alignment Project, a £27m international funding programme for AI alignment research, with new partners joining the coalition.
UK AISI announces a research partnership with ElevenLabs on voice AI security, studying how people distinguish AI from humans in real-time voice and how perceived identity affects trust. No results yet.
Summarises an international AI safety institute network's consensus on AI evaluation best practice, including clear objectives, transparency and reproducibility, and open measurement questions for frontier AI.
UK AISI's year-in-review highlights its first Frontier AI Trends Report, which tracks dangerous capability growth in cyber, bio, and chemistry from two years of testing, plus government preparedness work.
UK AISI summarises findings from two years of frontier model evaluations, showing models now exceed PhD-level chemistry and biology QA performance.
UK AISI and Thorn publish a safety protocol for AI developers to prevent AI-generated CSAM, alongside legislation allowing authorised testing of whether models can generate such material.
Announces a UK AISI–Google DeepMind research partnership with planned joint work on chain-of-thought monitoring, socio-affective alignment, and AI's economic impact. No results are reported.
UK AISI previews NeurIPS 2025 papers on malicious fine-tuning limits, data filtering as a defense, and a review of 445 LLM benchmarks finding popular ones often fail to measure what they claim.
UK AI Security Institute announces a £15M+ global fund to support AI alignment research. It is a funding announcement with no technical findings, so it is only directly related to the field.
International joint testing exercise by AI safety institutes evaluating LLM agents for sensitive-information leakage, fraud and cybersecurity risks, focusing on agent evaluation methodology.
UK AI Security Institute sets out its research priorities, its approach to technical solutions for pressing AI concerns, and the key risks to address as capabilities advance.
UK AISI announces 20 seed grants for independent research on safeguarding critical infrastructure and societal systems against AI-related risks, spanning misinformation, worker impacts and decision safety.
UK AISI outlines its technical research agenda on safeguards against AI misuse and loss of control, covering the widening gap between capabilities and mitigations, plus hiring and grants.
UK and US AI Safety Institutes jointly ran pre-deployment tests of OpenAI's o1 across cyber, biological, and AI-development capabilities, comparing it against reference models and sharing findings before release.
Joint UK and US AISI pre-deployment evaluation of upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet across biological, cyber, AI-development and safeguard domains, comparing against reference models.
UK AI Security Institute's first-year reflection on building government capacity to run dangerous-capability evaluations and shape an international approach to measuring frontier AI risks.
UK AISI announces Inspect Evals, an open-source repository of community LLM benchmarks spanning coding, cyber, safeguards and agents, to standardise safety-relevant evaluation.
UK AISI announces a bounty seeking novel dangerous-capability evaluations, especially for autonomous agents, and licensed agent scaffolds to test frontier model capabilities.
UK AISI blog on third-party evaluation of frontier AI systems, covering which systems, risks and capabilities to test, and how to run robust pre-deployment safety evaluations.
UK AISI announces grants of up to £200,000 for research on systemic AI safety, meaning broader societal risks from AI deployment beyond individual model capabilities.
Geoffrey Irving explains why he left alignment research for the UK AI Safety Institute, arguing safety progress is too slow and technical work informing government and risk coordination is critical.
Announces an invite-only AISI and GovAI conference and call for submissions on designing and implementing frontier AI safety frameworks, following the Seoul commitments.
UK AISI reports evaluations of five public LLMs for cyber, chem/bio expert knowledge, short-horizon agent tasks and jailbreak vulnerability, finding high jailbreak susceptibility and limited autonomous planning.
UK AI Security Institute's fourth progress report covering its first model evaluation blog post, the International Scientific Report on AI safety, Inspect release, office and partnership news, and staff growth.
An interim international scientific report, chaired by Yoshua Bengio, reviewing evidence on advanced AI progress, safety risks, and areas of expert disagreement.
UK AI Security Institute open-sources Inspect, its LLM evaluation framework with prompt engineering, tool use, multi-turn dialogue and model-graded evaluation support.
The UK and US AI Safety Institutes agree to jointly test advanced AI models, share research, exchange model access, and transfer expert talent.
Announces a partnership between the UK AI Security Institute and France's Inria to advance AI safety research. It is an institutional announcement with no technical findings.
UK AISI overview of its evaluation work: rationale, what risks it tests for, model selection, recent demonstrations, and future plans for frontier model safety evaluations.
UK AISI progress report on recruiting researchers, publishing principles for the International AI Safety Report, and starting pre-deployment testing of advanced AI systems. Mostly organisational news.