Constitutional AI Alignment
A long LessWrong essay proposing a bullet-point constitution describing an aligned AI, critiquing Claude's Soul Document on moral patienthood and arguing for constitutional alignment as a training target.
Research / Sources
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
A long LessWrong essay proposing a bullet-point constitution describing an aligned AI, critiquing Claude's Soul Document on moral patienthood and arguing for constitutional alignment as a training target.
Argues that every technical alignment plan must step into the dark without feedback from superintelligent systems, and urges making the AI development process more iterable and slower.
Proposes training agents to have preferences only between outcomes with equal numbers of copies (POSC), so they neither pay costs to self-replicate nor are strongly disposed to it, as a safeguard against AI self-replication.
Philosophical essay arguing current alignment relies on thin ethical concepts like honesty and harmlessness, and proposing thick, pluralistic alignment that captures context-dependent values.
Proposes recursive alignment, defined as AI aligning with the process of resolving goal conflicts, and argues it could resist power-seeking and deceptive alignment, critiquing deliberative alignment.