The Case for Physical AI Safety
A white paper launching the Physical AI Safety Institute argues that robot foundation models pose neglected, tractable safety risks and calls for research on interpreting, aligning and controlling them.
Research / Sources
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
A white paper launching the Physical AI Safety Institute argues that robot foundation models pose neglected, tractable safety risks and calls for research on interpreting, aligning and controlling them.
Compares RLHF, Constitutional AI and Deliberative Alignment through a persona-emotion-behavior framework, argues CAI yields more stable personas, and cautions against activation steering that models could learn to evade.
Layer-wise analysis of Llama-3.1-70B finds jailbreak prompts show mid-layer harm signal that drops before output, unlike standard harmful prompts; the author notes structural confounds and calls for causal tests.
Traces SAE concealment features across training stages of a deceptive model organism, finding deflection features emerge after red-team training, with no evaluator-specific compliance差异.
Assesses whether training data attribution can become a practical frontier-LLM tool, covering its feasibility, obstacles from labs' data secrecy, possible policies, and its modest expected value for reducing large-scale AI risk.