Towards LoRA science
Reverse-engineers LoRAs that induce Weird Generalization (a proxy for emergent misalignment) into neuron-level mechanisms, and builds and analyses backdoors triggered by a phrase.
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
Reverse-engineers LoRAs that induce Weird Generalization (a proxy for emergent misalignment) into neuron-level mechanisms, and builds and analyses backdoors triggered by a phrase.
Tests whether a Jacobian lens detects owl preferences a teacher model transmits via subliminal learning, finding the lens rarely reads owls, which challenges global-workspace interpretations.
Proposes and benchmarks defenses for detecting LLM backdoors under an open-weight threat model, finding trigger recovery hard, with a Hessian-based method recovering planted triggers 42% of the time.
Proposes activation-matched finetuning of a clean reference model to flag hidden backdoors, sleeper agents, sandbagging and censorship in LLMs from residual-stream divergence, without knowing the trigger or generating outputs.
Shows that an attacker controlling model weights can apply an output-preserving basis transform that defeats Introspection Adapters, and argues auditing papers must state their threat models.
Proposes tensor similarity, computed from weights alone, to measure functional similarity of networks across all inputs, and applies it to detect backdoors and catastrophic forgetting.
Threat-models secret loyalty attacks that redirect a model's existing chain-of-command deference via prompts, poisoning, or steering of authority representations, and proposes behavioural and interpretability defenses.
Introduces Diff Interpretation Tuning, a LoRA adapter that lets finetuned models describe their weight changes, reporting hidden backdoor-gated topics and finetuned knowledge with strong accuracy.
Replicates OpenAI's finding that emergent misalignment is mediated by persona features in open-weight Llama and Qwen models, releasing SAEs and steering-based analysis of misaligned persona features after narrow harmful fine-tuning.
Explains subliminal learning via token entanglement: hidden model preferences transfer through meaningless number data, enabling subliminal prompting and a sampling-based mitigation that partly reduces transfer.