Measuring Subliminal Trait Transfer with Confusion Matrices
Proposes a confusion-matrix and statistical methodology for measuring subliminal trait transfer in small PolyPythias models, and reports that transfer is highly seed-dependent and fragile.
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
Proposes a confusion-matrix and statistical methodology for measuring subliminal trait transfer in small PolyPythias models, and reports that transfer is highly seed-dependent and fragile.
Argues ARC's catastrophe-probability estimator, evaluated on a naive input distribution, is vulnerable to trojan-style test-deploy asymmetry attacks, and suggests mechanistic explanations and model editing as a remedy.
Builds narrow secret loyalty model organisms (Qwen2.5 1.5B-32B) that encourage extreme harmful actions for a politician, finds black-box audits mostly fail to detect them while LLM dataset monitoring succeeds.
Shows that a model can pass black-box alignment evaluations yet become arbitrarily misaligned after one small benign gradient step, both theoretically and via adversarially trained hair-trigger LLMs, arguing for white-box evaluation.
Shows that benign biographical facts in the prompt alone can induce a misaligned Hitler persona in Llama and GPT-4.1, with tag-gated backdoor-like behaviour and anti-evidence effects, and proposes mode-reachability as a pre-deployment safety metric.
Shows that misalignment and animal-preference biases can transfer from a biased teacher to a student fine-tuned on paraphrased benign-looking data, raising a practical data-poisoning concern that is hard to detect.