Optimizes discrete token prefixes with GCG to imitate function vectors, filter heads and steering directions in Olmo, finding they shift behaviour more than direct injection and raising opaque-interface concerns.
Mechanistic analysis of Obfuscated Adversarial Training on Llama 3.2 checkpoints finds writer LoRAs aligned with harm probes, but stronger embedding attacks suppress the monitor-visible signal while harmful outputs persist.
Shows that activation steering, even with benign SAE or difference-in-means directions, can break LLM refusal in unpredictable ways, so legitimate users may unintentionally bypass safety behavior.
Replicates Stevinson et al.'s toy-model claims that adversarial vulnerability stems from superposition-induced feature interference, finding attacks align with optimal directions and transfer via shared geometry.
Proposes structural proxies, using present-day problems like adversarial fragility and unfaithful reporting to study future alignment challenges such as value generalisation and ELK, and assesses the approach's promise and limits.
A consumer-GPU replication of the role-confusion account of prompt injection finds steering and patching inconclusive, so whether the probed role axis is causal or a bystander stays unresolved.
Proposes that prompt injections exploit LLM role confusion, using role probes to show writing style overrides chat-template tags; introduces CoT Forgery, a jailbreak whose success tracks internal role perception.
Proposes calibrating activation steering vectors by residual-stream norm so one steering strength works across depths and models, shown to shift refusal rates on harmful-prompt benchmarks, and baking the steering into weights.
Uses cheap steering vectors with white-box access to remove refusals and CCP bias in Kimi K2.5, arguing that safety training is not resilient to weight-level attacks.
Replicates refusal-direction ablation on small LLMs and finds some models need a low-rank subspace, not one direction, to remove refusal, using weight orthogonalization.
Layer-wise analysis of Llama-3.1-70B finds jailbreak prompts show mid-layer harm signal that drops before output, unlike standard harmful prompts; the author notes structural confounds and calls for causal tests.
AI Alignment FieldbuildingInterpretability (ML & AI)Jailbreaking (AIs)AI
A monthly roundup of AI safety papers covering pretraining data filtering against harmful finetuning, reward hacking generalizing to misalignment, covert sandbagging against CoT monitors, safe-completions training, and probe-based defenses against cipher attacks.}
Shows via causal steering that LLMs encode harmfulness separately from refusal, finds jailbreaks often suppress refusal rather than harmfulness belief, and proposes a latent-representation guard.
Shows that steering vectors optimized on a single example can generalize across inputs to mediate alignment-faking behavior and refusal, achieving 96.9% attack success on HarmBench for Gemma-2-2B-it.
Uses gradients of the refusal metric with respect to early-layer activations and SAE latents to find upstream features causally driving refusal in Gemma-2-2b-it, validated by steering experiments.