Misaligned AI as a New Insider Risk
This policy memo argues that misaligned AI models with privileged access should be treated as insider risks in high-stakes government contexts, and recommends adapting continuous evaluation and monitoring to them.
Research preprints from the scientific community. arxiv.org
This policy memo argues that misaligned AI models with privileged access should be treated as insider risks in high-stakes government contexts, and recommends adapting continuous evaluation and monitoring to them.
Proposes backchaining loss-of-control mitigations from errors an AI system makes on national-security benchmarks, then selectively restricting the affordances and permissions that would enable harm.
Proposes least-privilege language models that restrict reachable internal computation at inference via nested rank-indexed networks, enabling reversible suppression of targeted capabilities with limited collateral degradation.
Proposes a Governable AI framework that uses cryptographic, externally enforced rule compliance to keep advanced AI controllable under extreme threat models, with a formal security proof and prototype.
Report analyzes how flexible hardware-enabled guarantees could support international AI governance on proliferation, loss of control, military AI, and strategic stability, with game-theoretic stability analysis.
Presents Clio, a privacy-preserving platform that uses AI assistants to aggregate real-world Claude usage patterns and detect coordinated abuse, supporting safety monitoring and governance.