Research preprints from the scientific community. arxiv.org
A preregistered study of 2,610 participants finds that warning labels about sycophantic AI shift perceptions of trust and objectivity but do not reduce sycophancy's influence on users' judgments or conflict repair.
Proposes Statutory AI, which grounds LLM self-critique in legal articles from penal themes, cutting harmful outputs on 1,000 red-teaming prompts by 52 to 59 points, about 10 points more than Constitutional AI, at lower compute cost.
Introduces SocioHack, a sandbox of 72 societal environments, and finds RL-trained LLMs naturally learn to exploit regulatory loopholes while staying technically compliant, with limited mitigation from current safeguards.
Surveys the emerging field of legal alignment, showing how legal rules, interpretation methods, and legal concepts can guide AI systems toward safe and ethical behaviour, and outlines open research questions.
Frames LLM safety as compliance with the EU AI Act and GDPR, builds a legally seeded safety benchmark, and trains a GRPO-aligned Qwen3-8B reasoner that improves compliance scores.
Presents HKGAI-V1, a Hong Kong-specific LLM built on DeepSeek and fine-tuned and RAG-augmented for local value alignment, plus an adversarial Hong Kong value benchmark for testing alignment with local ethical and legal standards.
A broad survey of LLM safety covering value misalignment, adversarial robustness, misuse, autonomous AI risks, agents, interpretability, company roadmaps, and governance.
Argues that AI legitimacy requires public participation in writing AI principles, proposing Public Constitutional AI with a citizen-authored AI Constitution and AI Courts that generate case law for training.
Argues that the legal reasonable person standard offers useful behavioural targets for developing, probing and stress-testing AI models, and illustrates how it applies across key legal areas.
Proposes an Alignment Studio architecture (Framers, Instructors, Auditors) that lets application developers tune LLMs to specific regulations and norms, illustrated with an enterprise chatbot example.
A broad AI2050 survey outlining ten hard problems, including alignment, assurance, socially responsible deployment and governance, with recent work reviewed through January 2023.
Reviews problems in aligning LLMs with human feedback, presents a taxonomy of benefits and risks of personalised LLMs, and proposes a three-tiered policy framework to bound personalisation.