Principles for Embedded Evaluations
Apollo Research proposes principles for embedded third-party evaluations of frontier developers, verifying or falsifying safety claims about loss-of-control risks from scheming.
Understanding and evaluating deceptive AI. apolloresearch.ai
Apollo Research proposes principles for embedded third-party evaluations of frontier developers, verifying or falsifying safety claims about loss-of-control risks from scheming.
Apollo Research argues that final-checkpoint external testing is insufficient for catching internal-deployment risks and that meaningful external evaluation needs embedded evaluators with employee-level access.
Compares six methods for forecasting frontier LM agent benchmark scores ahead of time, using Chatbot Arena Elo and compute, backtested on OpenLLM v2 models, to anticipate dangerous capabilities on SWE-Bench, Cybench and RE-Bench.
Proposes "precursory capabilities" and a zoning taxonomy so pre-deployment information sharing and tripwire thresholds can flag frontier models approaching catastrophic-risk red lines.
Apollo Research argues that high-quality frontier-model safety evals are scarce and slow to build, and calls for more resources to close this "evals gap."
Apollo Research outlines five policy positions for governments, arguing evaluations alone are insufficient and that AI safety needs defence-in-depth, independent verification, and interpretability.
Apollo Research announces its engagement with US AI governance bodies (AISI Consortium, NIST working groups) to build an international evaluation ecosystem for dangerous capabilities and misalignment.
Argues AI safety evals need a rigorous "Science of Evals" for trustworthy methodology, citing prompt-sensitivity problems that undermine eval results used in safety and deployment decisions.
An Apollo Research starter guide introducing model evaluations: what evals measure, why they inform decisions like Responsible Scaling Policies, and how to start a career in the field.
Apollo Research lays out how AI auditing, including system evaluations and training audits, could reduce catastrophic misalignment risk, and where such approaches may fail.
Apollo Research recommends that the UK AI Safety Summit pursue international commitments on AI risk classification, responsibilities across the value chain, and evaluation-based compliance for frontier models.