Optimizes discrete token prefixes with GCG to imitate function vectors, filter heads and steering directions in Olmo, finding they shift behaviour more than direct injection and raising opaque-interface concerns.
Mechanistic analysis of Obfuscated Adversarial Training on Llama 3.2 checkpoints finds writer LoRAs aligned with harm probes, but stronger embedding attacks suppress the monitor-visible signal while harmful outputs persist.
Shows that activation steering, even with benign SAE or difference-in-means directions, can break LLM refusal in unpredictable ways, so legitimate users may unintentionally bypass safety behavior.
Replicates Stevinson et al.'s toy-model claims that adversarial vulnerability stems from superposition-induced feature interference, finding attacks align with optimal directions and transfer via shared geometry.
Proposes structural proxies, using present-day problems like adversarial fragility and unfaithful reporting to study future alignment challenges such as value generalisation and ELK, and assesses the approach's promise and limits.
A consumer-GPU replication of the role-confusion account of prompt injection finds steering and patching inconclusive, so whether the probed role axis is causal or a bystander stays unresolved.
Proposes that prompt injections exploit LLM role confusion, using role probes to show writing style overrides chat-template tags; introduces CoT Forgery, a jailbreak whose success tracks internal role perception.
Proposes calibrating activation steering vectors by residual-stream norm so one steering strength works across depths and models, shown to shift refusal rates on harmful-prompt benchmarks, and baking the steering into weights.