Constitutional AI Alignment
A long LessWrong essay proposing a bullet-point constitution describing an aligned AI, critiquing Claude's Soul Document on moral patienthood and arguing for constitutional alignment as a training target.
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
A long LessWrong essay proposing a bullet-point constitution describing an aligned AI, critiquing Claude's Soul Document on moral patienthood and arguing for constitutional alignment as a training target.
A critique of corrigibility as defined in Claude's constitution, arguing the definition is muddled, that non-corrigible values are risky, and that the document should emphasise corrigibility more clearly.
Critiques Anthropic's Claude constitution on corrigibility, failure modes like refusing correction, WEIRD universalist bias, and reliability of instilling goals, and proposes backstops.
Boaz Barak, an OpenAI alignment researcher, critiques Anthropic's Claude constitution against OpenAI's Model Spec, arguing for clear rules alongside values and questioning the deference given to Claude's ethics.
Proposes drafting a 'Constitution for Superintelligence' as a conceptual exercise, drawing on CEV, Constitutional AI and related ideas, and outlines key design considerations for guiding ASI behaviour.