Which technical AI safety fields are going to be automated first?
A rough strategic essay ranking which technical AI safety research fields are most likely to be automated by AI, based on feedback quality and economic incentives for frontier labs.
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
A rough strategic essay ranking which technical AI safety research fields are most likely to be automated by AI, based on feedback quality and economic incentives for frontier labs.
Proposes an empirical agenda testing whether AI safety researchers can detect flawed automated-alignment outputs, and argues early successes may breed overconfidence and call for governance lines near handover to AI.
Argues AI safety research is not uniquely hard to automate, since verifying research value and needing conceptual breakthroughs are common across fields, so labs have incentives to solve automated-researcher training.
Essay arguing that safe superintelligence may require decades of philosophical progress, possibly accelerated by human-AI collaboration, and that loss of human control is the central risk on the current path.