Attunement, not alignment
Argues that aligning AI to human moral judgments is misguided and proposes training agents to attune to societal flourishing and plurality, as AlphaZero learned chess without human games.
AI research and discussion on LessWrong. www.lesswrong.com
Argues that aligning AI to human moral judgments is misguided and proposes training agents to attune to societal flourishing and plurality, as AlphaZero learned chess without human games.
A philosopher argues that aligned values may not stay reflectively stable under moral skepticism at AGI/ASI levels, and proposes tying AI self-assessed welfare to morality as a way to keep alignment robust.
Argues that LLMs can now load human intent and values, so alignment is tractable but unsolved, citing InstructGPT, Constitutional AI, and emergent misalignment results.